This 1996 novel is infamous for its length and complex narrative structure, while being critically lauded for its themes and style. We discuss how Wallace approached the project, while grappling with revelations about how he treated women both on-and-off the page.
Interested in the media we discussed this episode? Please support the show by purchasing it through our affiliate store:
Additional Resources:
- The Afterlife of David Foster Wallace
- Infinite Proofs: The Effects of Mathematics on David Foster Wallace!
- David Foster Wallace at 50: Why he still matters and always will
- MICHAEL PIETSCH: EDITING INFINITE JEST
- A BRIEF (CROWD-SOURCED) INTERVIEW WITH MICHAEL PIETSCH
- ‘Infinite Jest’ celebrates 20th anniversary
- God, Mary Karr and Ronald Reagan: D.T. Max on David Foster Wallace
- Mary Karr Speaks Out About David Foster Wallace Amid Literature’s #MeToo Movement
- 10 Things You Probably Didn’t Know About Infinite Jest
- Why Insufferable People Love Infinite Jest
- Men Recommend David Foster Wallace to Me
- 15 Facts About Infinite Jest
- Reading from the “Blind-spots”
- A Short Meditation on the Whiteness of David Foster Wallace’s Writing
- Thinking About David Foster Wallace, Misogyny and Scholarship
- The Magic of Michael Schur’s Sitcoms: Why ‘The Good Place,’ ‘Parks and Rec’ & More Are So Rewatchable
- An Interview with Michael Schur
- ‘Parks and Recreation’: ‘Infinite Jest’ references in ‘Partridge’
Together with guest Van Jensen, we dissect the original James Bond source material. We look at Ian Fleming’s life and possible wish fulfillment, as well as how he wrote and published this post-World War II spy story. And of course, we’d be remiss if we didn’t also discuss Bond’s misogyny and nationalistic fantasizing.